Cliff vs. Limit: How Should Washington Tackle the Matters at Hand?

Some analysts say moves to avoid the “fiscal cliff” should be resolved alongside the need to again address the national debt ceiling. Others say that’s a bridge too far.

Artistic_Bridge_SmallHow might Americans know when negotiations between President Obama and congressional leaders are getting serious on the “fiscal cliff”? “When they start using the words ‘debt limit,’ ” says J.D. Foster, a senior fellow at the conservative Heritage Foundation.

How to back the nation off the cliff – short-hand for the more than $600 billion in higher taxes and lower government spending set to hit the American economy beginning Jan. 1 – is all the buzz in Washington. But immediately behind that lurks the need for Washington to confront, again, what to do about bumping up against the debt ceiling, a matter that is vital to the actual functioning of America’s government.

A dive off the fiscal cliff (meaning no action is taken to avert the tax hikes and big spending cuts) means the US economy would enter a recession in 2013 and the unemployment rate would rise to more than 9 percent, according to the forecast of the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO). No one in Washington wants to put the country through that. But America has survived recessions.

What the nation has not endured before are the effects of congressional refusal to raise the national debt ceiling, such as a potential default on its debt obligations, a blow to its credit rating, and a crippling of government operations.

Click here to read the complete article.

Source: David Grant | The Christian Science Monitor